Honoring Ancient History
Catarina and Danillo Prímola had planned to name their newborn son Piyé, paying homage to the first black Egyptian pharaoh who had ruled Egypt for 30 years and helped in founding the 25th dynasty.
The couple believed it would be a “powerful way to give a new narrative to the history of black people.”
Court’s Concerns Over Bullying
However, the Court of Justice in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais and registry office ruled that Piyé’s pronunciation is too similar to plié – a Portuguese word for a ballet dance step.
The court claimed the parents would not be permitted to “register first names that could expose their bearers to ridicule” and that the name could cause “future embarrassment to the child.”
Couple’s Fight for the Name
The Prímolas argued that the court’s decision was misguided, with Danillo stating, “We know that bullying cannot be combated by prohibiting it, nor can it be combated by oppression. Bullying can be combated by studying and working on the ignorance of society as a whole.”
Precedents for Blocking Baby Names
This is not the first time a court has stepped in to block parents from choosing certain names for their children.
In 2013, a judge in Tennessee ordered a baby’s name to be changed from Messiah to Martin, citing religious concerns. Similarly, courts in France have rejected names like Nutella and Prince William, believing they could lead to the children being mocked.
Overturning the Ruling
Fortunately, the court’s decision to ban the name Piyé was reversed on Friday, allowing the Prímolas to proceed with their chosen name for their child.
Challenging Societal Biases
The case highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the role of courts in regulating baby names and the need to challenge societal biases and prejudices that can lead to the bullying of children with unique or unconventional names.
The Prímolas’ fight to honor their cultural heritage through their son’s name is a testament to their determination to reshape the narrative.
Leave a Reply