Months after the deal was reached, the White House took forÂmal steps to secure data transÂfers between the UnitÂed States and the EuroÂpean Union.
PresÂiÂdent Biden signed an execÂuÂtive order directÂing the govÂernÂmenÂtâs efforts to impleÂment the EU-US Data PriÂvaÂcy Framework.
This approach is priÂmarÂiÂly based on the idea that priÂvaÂcy and civÂil libÂerÂties are âconÂsidÂeredâ before intelÂliÂgence agenÂcies ask for data, and that surÂveilÂlance is only perÂmitÂted when there is a clearÂly defined need to address nationÂal secuÂriÂty concerns.
IntelÂliÂgence agenÂcies also need to review and update their poliÂcies to mainÂtain them on eleÂments such as data hanÂdling. We will also have a âlayÂeredâ review process for susÂpectÂed priÂvaÂcy vioÂlaÂtions for EU residents.
The Office of the DirecÂtor of NationÂal IntelÂliÂgence (DNI), through its CivÂil LibÂerÂties OffiÂcers, will invesÂtiÂgate posÂsiÂble vioÂlaÂtions of the law, and the AttorÂney GenÂerÂal will use the new Data ProÂtecÂtion Review Court to review its findÂings and issue bindÂing rulÂings. will be lowered.
The Data PriÂvaÂcy FrameÂwork responds to the EU Court of JusÂticeâs 2020 withÂdrawÂal of the PriÂvaÂcy Shield Agreement.
The court deterÂmined that the deal gave the US too much freeÂdom to police EU data and was inconÂsisÂtent with priÂvaÂcy requireÂments that are virÂtuÂalÂly equivÂaÂlent to EuroÂpean law.
The US objectÂed to the refusal, sayÂing it called into quesÂtion comÂpaÂniesâ abilÂiÂty to legalÂly transÂfer data.
The EuroÂpean ComÂmisÂsion still needs to conÂduct a review to deterÂmine whether this frameÂwork proÂvides sufÂfiÂcient protection.
But between this agreeÂment and agreeÂments aimed at law enforceÂment agenÂcies such as AusÂtralia and the UnitÂed KingÂdom, the UnitÂed States, despite some conÂcerns that spies still have too much powÂer, has changed its approach to interÂnaÂtionÂal data sharÂing is rapidÂly becomÂing established.
Leave a Reply